Showing posts with label Ninth Amendment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ninth Amendment. Show all posts

Sunday, May 2, 2021

Answering QUORA Questions About the Second Amendment

QUORA: ‘What would happen if SCOTUS were to rule that the right to keep and bear arms is to be limited only to those people who are members of the well-regulated militia?’ 


I posted this answer:


Nothing. The Ninth Amendment reads “The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.” The right of a group of citizens to keep and bear arms as an association is an extension of the individual’s right to keep and bear arms. Rights belong to individuals. An individual does not need to join a group like a well-regulated militia to acquire that right. So even in the event that the Supreme Court ruled that the Second Amendment only enumerates the private right of a militia, the individual right to keep and bear arms is not infringed.


QUORA: Where does the Second Amendment say that individual citizens have the right to have guns? 


I posted this answer:


Wrong question. The U.S. Constitution is a document that enumerates the powers of the government, thus limiting the government’s powers. The proper framing of the issue is, “Where does the Constitution empower the government to prohibit individual citizens from owning guns?” Answer: It doesn’t. Hence, however the Second Amendment is interpreted, the right to own guns is not affected. The Ninth Amendment, which reads “The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people,” assures that right. 


QUORA: ‘Do you believe the 2nd Amendment gives US citizens the right to carry a gun?’ 


I posted this answer:


Rights are not “given” by the Constitution. Rights precede government. As the Declaration of Independence clearly states, “to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men.” The proper purpose of a government is to recognize and protect individual rights, not grant them. The fact that the Constitution enumerates some rights, like the rights to free speech or public trial by jury, does not mean only those rights. As the Ninth Amendment reads, “The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.” So however the “right of the people to keep and bear arms” is interpreted, and given the fact that the Constitution does not grant the government the power to forbid private ownership of arms, the right of an individual to carry a gun is absolute so long as the individual does not use it in a way that threatens or violates the rights of others.


QUORA: ‘How would you amend the 2nd Amendment?’


I posted this answer:


I wouldn’t bother to amend the Second Amendment. Granted, the wording leaves open the question of whether the Second Amendment covers individual or collective rights. But we need not agonize over the wording of the Second Amendment. America’s concept of governance is based on constitutionally enumerated governmental powers. To my knowledge, the U.S. Constitution does not grant the government the power to forbid the private individual right to possess arms. 


The Constitution does make clear that the individual rights explicitly covered in the Bill of Rights, including the 2nd Amendment, are far from the only rights held by the people as individuals. While the Second Amendment wording may be ambiguous and open to debate, the right to “bear arms” is most clearly protected by the Ninth Amendment.  That Amendment states “The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.” It follows that the individual right to bear arms, including guns, is unquestionable. 


The right to bear arms, including a gun, is an inalienable individual right protected, if not by the Second Amendment, then by the Ninth Amendment. There is no need to amend the Second Amendment.


In regards to a clear understanding of individual rights, I recommend Moral Rights and Political Freedom by Professor Tara Smith 


Related Reading:


Burden of Proof is On Government in Concealed Carry Case


Gun Control Should focus On Principles, Not Guns


Former Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens’ Scary Attack on the Right of ‘Personal Self-Defense'


Collectivized Rights by Ayn Rand


The Second Amendment Is About an Individual Right, Not a Collective One by Michael Marshall for The University of Virginia School of Law 


Putting the Second Amendment Second: Reframing the constitutional debate over gun control, by AKHIL REED AMAR for Slate


My comment on David Johnson’s answer to QUORA: ‘Which amendment gives U.S. citizens the right to bear arms?’

Wednesday, December 4, 2019

QUORA: 'Could the 9th amendment about non-enumerated rights mean that healthcare is right?'



If this question refers to the “right to healthcare” as advocated by Bernie Sanders and his ilk, then the answer is, No. 

Rights are not arbitrary creations of government or politicians. Rights belong to individuals, and only individuals—no other unit of humanity exists. A right is a guarantee of freedom of action to pursue a goal without coercive interference from others. A right is not a guarantee of achieving that goal. There is no right to goods or services that others must be forced to provide. There is no right to enslave. Therefore, there is no right to healthcare other than what you can secure for yourself, or what others are willing to provide voluntarily through trade or charity. 

The concept of individual rights as unalienable, also known as natural rights and which the Declaration of Independence and U.S. Constitution refer to, means that all individuals possess the same rights, which means one’s right to act ends where the violation of others rights begin. Rights precede government, which is created “to secure these rights.” The unalienable rights of others constitutes the boundary beyond which the rightful actions of any individual cannot go, including individuals as elected legislators or government officials acting on their constituents’ behalf. The Ninth Amendment refers only to these unalienable rights. 

For those interested in digging much deeper into the issue, I recommend Tara Smith, Moral Rights and Political Freedom, and Randy E. Barnett, Restoring the Lost Constitution: The Presumption of Liberty Chapters 9 (“The Mandate of the Ninth Amendment”) & 10 (“The Presumption of Liberty: Protecting Rights Without Listing Them”).

Related Reading: