The question implies that those programs are
voluntary. They are not.
Like everyone else (me included), Rand “used”
Social Security and Medicare** because she was forced into it, by law--which
means, at governmental gunpoint. As with any tax, if you evade your Social
Security and Medicare taxes, you’ll be arrested, fined, and probably thrown in
a cage. The fact that we Americans are forced into these programs by our own
government, the very government that we should be able to count on to protect
our rights to act on our own judgement and protect our property from thieves, is
precisely what makes Social Security and Medicare immoral and in need of being
phased out and abolished, as a matter of justice.
Justice also demands that a person should get
what she pays for, even if the payment is forced. So regardless of what a person’s
opinion is of Social Security and Medicare, anyone who pays FICA taxes is
morally and rightfully as well as legally entitled to collect the promised
benefits as long as these programs exist.
It is fully consistent, morally and logically,
to “use” Social Security and Medicare while simultaneously expressing
opposition. Both positions are based on justice. This view is also consistent
with Ayn Rand’s work, given that justice is considered in her philosophy of
Objectivism to be a cardinal virtue.
* [Quora is a social media website founded by
two former Facebook employees. According to Wikipedia:
Quora is a
question-and-answer website where questions are
created, answered, edited and organized by its community of users. The company
was founded in June 2009, and the website was made available to the public on
June 21, 2010.[3]Quora aggregates questions and answers to topics. Users can
collaborate by editing questions and suggesting edits to other users' answers.[4]
You can also reply to other users’ answers.]
** [I’m assuming for argument's sake that Rand
actually did apply for and collect Social Security and Medicare benefits. If
she did not, she should have.]
SUPPLEMENTAL:
Note to those who accuse Rand and others who
conscientiously object to these programs while collecting the promised benefits
of being hypocritical: To claim the right to force people into submission to
your values, and then denounce them for objecting, is vicious and unjust, not
to mention comical. But, hey, smears and insults and intimidation are always
the last resort of those who can’t rationally refute the substance of the
arguments against.
Related Reading:
1 comment:
Ayn Rand believed it was only moral to collect social security benefits if you opposed it. Given her stated belief one cannot accuse her of hypocrisy. Even if she turned out to be wrong she was still acting upon her stated beliefs.
https://www.nyu.edu/projects/sciabarra/notablog/archives/002157.html
Post a Comment