There is a dangerous movement in New Jersey to
stifle the buildout of reliable energy infrastructure, particularly natural gas
pipelines and power plants. And it’s had considerable success. Already, it has stopped
construction of a new nat-gas power
plant in Hillsborough. In South Jersey, opposition to a nat-gas pipeline
has caused the owners of a coal-fired power plant to abandon
plans to convert it to
natural gas.
Now, a coalition of environmental groups has called
on Governor Phil Murphy to “halt a dozen proposed
natural gas power plants and pipelines in New Jersey.” Empower NJ, as this
group calls itself, wants Murphy to “focus entirely on developing green energy.” Brazenly belying its own title, Empower NJ calls only for
unreliable, expensive wind and solar, not nuclear, the obvious
choice for those truly
committed to “green”--non-fossil fuel--energy.
I don’t know if Murphy even has the power to
halt these projects. As of this writing, he has not done so. I submitted the
following as yet unpublished letter to the NJ Star-Ledger:
To the editors,
Recent calls by the Environmentalist coalition
Empower NJ for a “moratorium
. . . on natural
gas power plants and pipelines in New Jersey” is a dangerous gamble that
ignores the risk to human well-being (If
Murphy wants to be N.J.'s Captain Planet, he’ll need to overcome Christie’s
legacy first). We
in NJ enjoy plentiful reliable energy because years ago farsighted energy
producers foresaw the need for today’s energy, and put the infrastructure in
place to meet it. The same foresight drives this new infrastructure.
Technological breakthroughs may or may not somehow make “green” energy a viable
replacement. But wishing won’t make it so. Neither will halting these energy
projects. Hope is not foresight.
Whatever the effects of
fossil fuel use on climate, the value of reliable energy to our lives is
indisputable. Weather can be bad, as always. But energy deprivation would be
catastrophic. When “green” energy companies demonstrate their products’
superiority, consumers will buy it without subsidies, mandates, or fossil fuel
bans. Until then we should be thankful for the builders of nat-gas pipelines
and power plants. It is they, not Environmentalists, who have our future energy
security in mind.
Sincerely,
Michael A. LaFerrara
Flemington, NJ
Related Reading:
The Real Reason They Hate Nuclear Is Because It Means We Don't Need Renewables--Michael Shellenberger for Forbes
1 comment:
'not nuclear, the obvious choice for those truly committed to “green”--non-fossil fuel--energy.'
Which proves they do not actually care about the environment.
Nuclear power is the most concentrated, cleanest and safest form of power, with half the deaths/twh than hydro, the second safest form of power.
Know Nukes!
Post a Comment