Wednesday, February 21, 2024

Alabama Court’s Inhuman Ruling

In a thoroughly inhuman decision, an Alabama Supreme Court ruling has equated children to mere embryos. Dan Rosenzweig-Ziff reports:


The Alabama Supreme Court ruled Friday that frozen embryos are people and someone can be held liable for destroying them, a decision that reproductive rights advocates say could imperil in vitro fertilization (IVF) and affect the hundreds of thousands of patients who depend on treatments like it each year.


The Alabama case focused on whether a patient who mistakenly dropped and destroyed other couples’ frozen embryos could be held liable in a wrongful-death lawsuit. The court ruled the patient could, writing that it had long held that “unborn children are ‘children’” and that that was also true for frozen embryos, affording the fertilized eggs the same protection as babies under the Wrongful Death of a Minor Act.


An embryo is obviously not a person. An embryo is a POTENTIAL person, not an ACTUAL person. Persons are actual human entities you can see walking, talking, working, and generally going about the activity of living a life.  The embryo-as-a-person claim is a religious view, not a rational, observable, fact-based view. This law will saddle the IVF industry with unwarranted, potentially crippling liability, preventing countless potential human beings from being brought into existence for people desperate to become parents. It will literally turn innocent people into outlaws, ruin people financially—and ultimately landing innocent people in jail for non-murders, if the principle is developed to its logical end. This law is unConstitutional. It is also a moral abomination. It dehumanizes actual people. If the lives and properties of living human beings can be subordinated and sacrificed to potential human beings, it's the end of freedom and flourishing.

IVF is a crucial human value, and the embryo is crucially important because it is central to that end. But no value can ever be put above the value of an actual, individual, living human being—not the state, not society, not the race, not future generations, not God . . . and not the unborn, including embryos. That is the very definition of evil. This law is based on a thoroughly anti-human premise.


Related Reading:


Shock, anger, confusion grip Alabama after court ruling on embryos By Tim Craig and Sabrina Malhi


What to know about the Alabama embryo ruling and its IVF implications By Maham Javaid and Dan Rosenzweig-Ziff


Alabama ushers in the theocracy by Ruth Marcus


My Facebook Post on the Subject


2 comments:

Mike Kevitt said...

It doesn't matter whether an embryo is a person or not, as far as IVF is concerned. Whether it's a person or not, do IVF. How does an embryo being a person stop anybody from using embryos for IVF? How does an embryo NOT being a person stop anybody from using embryos for IVF?

Well, if they are people, then dropping a jug full of them on the floor, even by accident, is cause for nasty legal action. If they're not people, they're still property, so there's still cause for legal action.

I've learned that IVF entails using a big mess of eggs and a mess of resulting embryos from sperms fertilizing eggs, and picking the best embryo, or embryos, to implant. The others are culled out, and the mother might have a litter if enough embryos are implanted, if it doesn't kill her.

So, if embryos are people, this means a bunch of people are killed to get one baby, or a litter of babies, at the risk of the mother's life which, in the end, is her risk. So, yes, if embryos are people (or are considered people) this would STOP IVF unless only one embryo is produced and implanted to produce only one baby.

The chances of producing a fetus this way might be slim, and if it fails, that's nature and no legal action, unless a produced fetus ends up being aborted since, if an embryo is considered a person, then, surely, a fetus is considered a person.

Mike Kevitt said...

I add that I've said nor indicated nothing about whether I say an embryo or a fetus is or is not a person. I'm not saying what I say about that.