New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy arrests, fines,
and strips people of their licenses
and livelihoods for defying his
lockdown orders. He threatens business coalitions, telling
them “you’re playing with fire” for contemplating
opening their businesses before he allows it. He bans outdoor gathers larger
than 25. He arrogantly dismisses
his critics. When counties and
legislators request the ability to “open the economy” based on local
conditions, Murphy refuses, saying we act as “one state” because “it takes a village”. After the
indignity of dividing New Jersey businesses and workers into “non-essential”
(expendable) and “essential” (non-expendable) categories, Murphy has the nerve
to do
nothing but “urge caution” to the
George Floyd protestors who brazenly flout his orders. Where are the warnings
not to “play with fire”? Where are the arrests? Where do we see the police
moving in to shut down the Floyd protests, the way he does with private
businesses? What of his “one state” principle? Where is his precious “village”?
What happened to “saving lives”? What happened to “public health” comes first?
What happened to “We’re all in this together”?
Murphy apparently senses his own double standard.
In Gov.
Murphy to N.J. protesters: ‘I think you should get tested’ for coronavirus', Alex Napoliello and Brent Johnson report:
On Monday, Murphy drew a sharp distinction between these
demonstrations and recent protests calling for him to lift New Jersey’s
coronavirus restrictions faster and reopen more businesses.
“I don’t want to make light of this, and I’ll probably get lit up
by everyone who owns a nail salon in the state,” Murphy said. “But it’s one
thing to protest what day nail salons are opening, and it’s another to come out
in peaceful protest, overwhelmingly, about somebody who was murdered right
before our eyes."
Get that? People can protest Minneapolis police
abuse of power, but cannot protest Governor Murphy’s abuse of power. Where does
the U.S. or NJ constitution favor one protest over another? The First Amendment
protects “the right of the people . . . to petition the government for a
redress of grievances”. That goes for the Floyd protestors and lockdown
protestors equally, regardless of whether you are part of a mass protest or the
sole owner of a nail salon. What authority does Murphy have to treat them
differently? None. The 14th Amendment guarantees the equal protection of the
law for every individual, regardless of number.
This is a man who pledged, “I, Philip Dunton Murphy, elected governor of the State of New
Jersey, do solemnly promise and swear that I will support the Constitution of
the United States and the Constitution of the State of New Jersey,” and then declared that the Bill of Rights--the first 10 Amendments to the U.S
Constitution--is “above my pay grade”. I guess the 14th Amendment is above his
pay grade, too. Murphy’s unending executive orders directly violate the NJ
Constitution, which says only the legislature can make law. Murphy’s
digressions are laid bare. He violated his oath of office to “solemnly promise
and swear” to support the Constitutions of the United States and of NJ. Murphy
shouldn’t just get “lit up”. He should be impeached.
Related Reading:
3 comments:
What is the procedure in NJ for impeaching the governor and turning him/her out of office? If this was followed and this jughead was turned out of office, would that reflect positively on the people of NJ, and help turn the tide to individual rights?
"The Assembly can bring impeachment charges but the Senate is the court of impeachment in New Jersey, where the charges are tried." (https://nj.gov/nj/gov/understand/)
It would. But polls show overwhelming popular approval for Murphy's handling of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, I'm skeptical about the accuracy. We don't know anyone who does not have some level of dissatisfaction with him, and many who have strong negative feelings.
"It would." I'm not as charitable to the people as you are, including those in NJ, where I do not reside. Your personal poll says those of your knowledge have some dissatisfaction, and many with strong negative feelings toward Murphy. I believe your personal poll can't be extrapolated to the rest. That's ok, no problem. But, whether I'm right about extrapolation or not, if the Assembly isn't bringing impeachment charges, why not, I ask, rhetorically? Can't the people (particularly those in your personal poll) inveigh upon the Assembly to do so? Are they? if not, why not? Not being there, on the scene, I automatically assume everybody, from your poll on down, are sitting there like dunces. If I'm right, your "It would", is empty. If I'm wrong, please tell me and forgive me.
Post a Comment