tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5495065931245897039.post418058651104198701..comments2024-02-27T15:47:47.923-05:00Comments on Principled Perspectives: Striking Workers Shouldn't Get Unemployment Benefitsprincipled perspectiveshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06502754865268315342noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5495065931245897039.post-64240227694841238152016-06-04T00:55:22.431-04:002016-06-04T00:55:22.431-04:00Workers comp
Sean Callagy & Callagy Law
Family...<br /><a href="http://www.callagylaw.com" rel="nofollow">Workers comp</a><br /><a href="http://www.callagylaw.com" rel="nofollow">Sean Callagy & Callagy Law</a><br /><a href="http://www.callagylaw.com" rel="nofollow">Family Law</a><br /><br />Sean Callagy & Callagy Law team has won Two, 27 million dollar verdicts in 2 years. The firm focuses on litigation, medical revenue recovery, & family law in New Jersey, New York and Arizona. You can contact any time site: http://www.callagylaw.com<br />Subarna A.https://www.blogger.com/profile/17711472463179595706noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5495065931245897039.post-8946585040920979642016-05-19T20:25:55.800-04:002016-05-19T20:25:55.800-04:00These are private sector unions. Even so, labor la...These are private sector unions. Even so, labor law requires that if a majority of employees doing a particular type of work for a company votes to unionize (or join an existing union), the company must recognize the union as representative of that entire employee sector and the minority must join the union or leave. That’s my understanding. <br /><br />That aside—and presuming that all members of the union are there voluntarily, as I am regarding my union—you agree to abide by union by-laws and majority vote, as in the case of the decision to strike or not. So, yes, if the membership majority votes to strike, every member is presumed to have voluntarily walked off the job including anyone who voted not to strike. The interference of coercive labor laws certainly complicates the moral evaluation, though.<br /><br />I should add that not all union-company relationships are coercive. Some are voluntary contractual arrangements between companies and unions operating in industries that can and do include non-union competition. I’m not sure about Verizon’s union relationship. But in construction-related industries (including my industry, plumbing), company-union relationships are generally voluntary and mutually beneficial. For example, my union is required to provide apprentice training, retirement and health benefits, and whatever fringe benefits like sick and vacation pay the membership democratically approves, all at union membership expense. There are also no seniority rules. principled perspectiveshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06502754865268315342noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5495065931245897039.post-12014302066550100672016-05-19T15:42:51.107-04:002016-05-19T15:42:51.107-04:00Don't these unions, and other unions, force wo...Don't these unions, and other unions, force workers into membership or at least force them to pay dues thru labor law, on the basis of an election the unions held with non-union workers on their being represented by the unions in bargaining with the company? If a majority of the workers vote in favor of union representation, they are ALL represented. The labor law says so. The minority is forced to pay for representation they don't want, and they must abide by the insane work rules that will be established. And, of course, the company eagerly desires and backs all this. Those labor laws force the company to accept it.<br /><br />Under this regime, how can 'collective bargaining' be called voluntary action by individual members? How can a strike be similarly called voluntary action?Mike Kevittnoreply@blogger.com