tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5495065931245897039.post5174541720702632545..comments2024-02-27T15:47:47.923-05:00Comments on Principled Perspectives: Non-Objective Law and the Malignant Nature of Eminent Domainprincipled perspectiveshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06502754865268315342noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5495065931245897039.post-10498054968731396782014-11-19T20:48:25.479-05:002014-11-19T20:48:25.479-05:00After nearly 50 yrs., from age 22, I'm about t...After nearly 50 yrs., from age 22, I'm about tired of flap-jawing about all this stuff. But I can't resist responding to your 1st. paragraph, here.<br /><br />What are we fighting against? We're fighting against initiated brute physical force, thus crime by criminals. You fight that by effective responsive physical force, and you use gvt. for that as much as possible.<br /><br />If crime is intertwined with gvt., you must weed the two from each other and use gvt. to fight crime, as much as possible. Beyond that, you must fight on your own.<br /><br />But we're fighting the physical reality of crime. We have, therefore, the moral sanction. So we can use the physical power of gvt. against the infesting, infecting and displacement of gvt. & law done under cover of the guise of it.<br /><br />Who cares if the criminal looks like a respectable, law abiding citizen, maybe a politician or a cop, a nat'l. guardsman or a soldier on regular active duty? I DON'T.<br /><br />We got the law & gvt. We must seize it by whatever means needed. Then we must cut a few pieces of flab out of the Founding Documents and fill in the blanks they left, so we can flap the legal sanction in writing in the faces of anybody, then do it, and move on.<br /><br />We got the total philosophical sanction, except for the physical means. We must get the physical means, by all practicality, then do it, then keep it. We must keep it, forever, by FORCE. The force will always be responsive to any potential initiation. That's the moral.Mike Kevittnoreply@blogger.com